HMRC says care industry VAT grouping is “tax avoidance”
HMRC is warning that setting up VAT groups in the care industry to reclaim VAT on what would otherwise be exempt supplies is tax avoidance. What’s the full story?

HMRC says that it considers the structuring of VAT groups within the care industry to gain a tax advantage to be tax avoidance. State-regulated care providers registered with the Care Quality Commission supplying welfare services are exempt from VAT. This means that VAT is not charged on the provision of care services to the Local Authority and consequently, VAT cannot be recovered on any costs associated with the supply of those services.
The structuring involves the insertion of a company that is not regulated, to form a VAT group and act as a “middleman” between the regulated company and the local authority. VAT is then charged by the new company and recovered on costs. While this may seem like a niche area, it is relatively common planning in practice.
HMRC is launching a programme to review all instances where this avoidance arrangement is in place. Further information can be found in Spotlight 70, which explains that any powers used will only take effect once the investigation is complete. This means that where this specific arrangement is in place HMRC will not seek to claim tax back from any earlier period. Users of such arrangements should seek independent professional advice in the first instance.
Related Topics
-
Was a company buyback of EIS shares tax avoidance?
Two taxpayers used the “purchase of own shares” procedure to extract gains they’d made from enterprise investment scheme (EIS) shares. HMRC said this was unfair tax avoidance, the taxpayers disagreed. What did the Upper Tribunal decide?
-
HMRC’s new compliance check service
HMRC has published a collection of videos and notes to help if you’re picked for a compliance check. Is HMRC’s new service worth a look or is it just official propaganda?
-
Income sharing trouble for separated couple
After a couple separated one spouse received income from letting the property she jointly owned with her estranged spouse. HMRC taxed all the income on her. Was it right to do so or should her spouse have been taxed on half the income?