HMRC issues reminder about early December pay dates
Many businesses pay their employees early in December. However, for employees who also claim Universal Credit, this can cause a problem. HMRC has explained how to avoid it. What should you do?
In its latest employer bulletin, HMRC issued a reminder to employers that pay their employees earlier than usual in December. Employees who are in receipt of Universal Credit can be adversely affected if the correct reporting procedure is not followed, as the system for reporting income may include two payments for a single assessment period. As Universal Credit entitlement is assessed on an ongoing basis, this can reduce or even remove their entitlement altogether, causing hardship. Additionally, the reporting of zero earnings in the subsequent assessment period can mean that entitlement to the work allowance is lost in that period.
HMRC says that in order to avoid the issue, the employer should always use the regular contractual pay date in the full payment submission (FPS) - even if the pay date is earlier or later than usual. So, for December a business that usually pays employees on the last working day of the month should use 31 December on the FPS. Doing this will ensure the problem of double counting is avoided.
Related Topics
-
Could a special method increase your profits?
Your business has used the same partial exemption method for many years. Is it time to consider if a different method will improve your input tax recovery?
-
EVs and the tax-free mileage allowance
You’re a director and regularly use your electric vehicle (EV) for business journeys. Your company provides a workplace charger which is free for all staff to use. Does the origin of the electricity impact your claim for tax-free mileage?
-
HMRC loses employment status case involving football referees
HMRC has lost another employment status case, this time involving football referees engaged by Professional Game Match Officials Ltd (PGMOL). The tribunal rejected HMRC’s argument that the referees should be treated as employees for tax purposes. Why does the decision matter?